Today’s parable needs a little explanation. Placed in its context the message is much more meaningful.The parable has three parts. In the first, a king sends servants to invite guests to his son’s marriage feast, but they make light of it, refuse to come and kill the messengers. The angry king sends his troops to wipe them out and burn their city. In the second part, the king sends more servants out to invite others to the feast, everyone they find, the good and the bad. The third part deals with the discovery of a guest at the banquet that does not have on a wedding garment. He is cast out of the assembly into a place of darkness and gnashing teeth.A major theme of the Lord’s life was his criticism of the religious structures and authorities of his time. When Jesus curses the fig tree because it bears no fruit it is taken as a symbol of the spiritual deadness of the Temple cult. The invited guests who snubbed their noses at the king and were punished represent those who turned Judaism into a religion of law and ritual forgetting the spirit that animated it. The extreme reaction of the king represents God’s judgment on the religious authorities that remembered the law, but who had forgotten the “weightier” things, mercy, justice and compassion.The servants who were murdered in the parable are the prophets. The second group of servants who were sent out is the Apostles and Disciples of Christ. Those who accepted the invitation included the poor, the sick, and sinners of all kinds, the depressed, the outcasts of society, the Gentiles, the good and the bad. The man who was not properly dressed was a wolf in sheep’s clothing. He represents the one who slips into the assembly with evil intent. The early church was embroiled in an argument between the Judaizers who wanted to impose Judaic lawson the Church and the followers of St. Paul who opposed them. Thankfully, St. Paul won the day then, but the temptation to return to that stultifying form of legal dogmatism remained a problem and still does to this day. I dare say that Jesus would have much the same to say to us as he did to the rulers of the Temple cult.There is a popular slogan among evangelicals these days, “What Would Jesus Do?” That is a good question, but a dangerous one. I tell you right now that Jesus would not do what we think he would do. We do not typically make the decisions he would make. Unless we are ready to be numbered among sinners and crucified we’d best not ask that question. Jesus loved to associate with outcasts and sinners. He loved them so much his enemies said that he was one of them. They called Jesus a sinner and demon-possessed. Even his family thought him crazy. He angered religious authorities, breaking ritual laws and custom, so much that he was considered irreligious. We must be careful if we say we want to follow Jesus. “If they persecuted me, they will also persecute you,” he told his followers.
Fr. Alexander Schmemann taught that Jesus represents the end of religion. He did not come to found a new one.Jesus came to bring life not to construct still another Temple cult. “There will come a time when those who worship God will not worship in Jerusalem or on this mountain, but in spirit and truth.” The Church is not a club for the elite, for the righteous few. We have a name for that sort of thing and that is “cult”. The Church is not a cult it is a hospital for souls. “The Sabbath was made for man not man for the Sabbath.”There is not one among us that does not need to change. Not one. In one way or the other every life is in need of correction. If you remove all sinners from the church you will have no one left. “Let he who is without sin cast the first stone.” In this light the “wedding garment” becomes a garment of love as opposed to a “garment of law”. The guest who did not don his wedding garment was one who would be happy to cast the first, second, third and last stone. Therefore, he does not belong at the banquet or in the kingdom of heaven. Heaven has need of only one king.